Florida Ahead Of The Curve On Driver-Less Cars, But Questions Remain

Florida Ahead Of The Curve On Driver-Less Cars, But Questions Remain

Many people in the auto industry believe driverless cars are the future. Depending on who you believe, these cars will either take over the market completely or be a large part of it within the next decade.

Many states have not yet decided how to treat driverless cars legally. Florida is way ahead of those states. Although many of our state’s residents don’t realize it, we already have a driverless car law, and it doesn’t even require someone to be behind the wheel.

Our original driverless car law required someone with a driver’s license to be in the car and able to take it over if the computerized driving system failed. That’s not true anymore. Under our more recent law, a person doesn’t have to be in the car at all. As long as the system can bring the car to a stop if the technology fails, the “operator” can be monitoring the car at home from a smartphone app. That’s all Florida’s law requires.

Our state’s race to be at the forefront of driverless technology leaves some pretty big unanswered questions. The first is who is liable when the driverless car causes a crash. Is it the car manufacturer? Is it the operator, who may not even be in the car when the crash occurred? Could it be the company which wrote the code for the artificial intelligence system the car uses? If the car was connected to the operator through an app, could the app’s creator be on the hook as well? And of course: can a police officer give a driverless car a ticket, and if so, who pays it?

None of these questions have been answered. Although car manufacturers want a uniform set of federal standards which will let them deploy driverless cars throughout America, the Federal Department of Transportation is not there yet. Instead, it has adopted a more cautious wait-and-see approach to this emerging technology. It’s possible that it doesn’t want to issue regulations which become obsolete as the technology outruns the regulatory scheme.

Historically, cars have been treated legally as dangerous metal boxes, and almost all responsibility for their safe operation has fallen on drivers. Driverless cars may end up in a different place; they may be treated as a dangerous product, like a poorly engineered airbag which blows out shrapnel. No one really knows for sure, however, and there are limits on how well products liability law can be applied to what looks like a revolutionary change on our highways.

There’s no doubt that driverless cars may be best for all of us in the long run, because they don’t make the kind of mistakes that human drivers make. But we may go through a bumpy transition while these serious issues get sorted out. The courts are going to have a lot of work to do in the next few years as more and more driverless cars appear on Florida’s roads. To say there will be interesting challenges ahead for people in the automotive, technological, insurance, and legal fields may qualify as the understatement of the year.

Categories:
Contact Us
Injured? Need Help? Tell us about your case
  • Please enter your name.
  • This isn't a valid email address.
    Please enter your email address.
  • This isn't a valid phone number.
    Please enter your phone number.
    You entered an invalid number.
  • Please select an option.
  • Please enter a message.

Get the Help You Need Today

We're Ready to Fight for You. Request Your Free Case Evaluation Now.
    • Please enter your first name.
    • Please enter your last name.
    • Please enter your email address.
      This isn't a valid email address.
    • This isn't a valid phone number.
    • Please make a selection.
    • Please enter a message.